Recent Posts

New Jersey Estate Tax: What You Should Know
Estate Planning for Same Sex Couples
The Court Grants Motion to Suppress Good Case For The Defense Bar
Racial Profiling--4th Amendment Injustice related to evidence supporessed
No Crack Reduction for Career Offenders Even if Sentence is Based On the Crack Range


Criminal Law
Current Events
Introduction of Jason Matey's blog
Speedy Trial Defense not triggered after 27 month delay
Wills: The Basics
powered by

My Blog

Defending Against a FRO: You Need An Attorney

Post By Jason Matey, Attorney At Law, In a Domestic Violence case, what starts out as a TRO (Temporary Restraining Order) can become an FRO (Final Restraining Order) if the Judge finds that there is a sufficient evidentiary need for the Court to issue the Order of protection. Defending a client from the issuance of an FRO requires that the client understand what the issues are, what the rules apply (or don't apply), and what burden of proof the Judge will be applying.

These proceedings are usually handled during a proceeding that occurs over a two-date period. The first date occurs within several days of the issuance of the TRO and its service on the client. During the first hearing date, it is essential for the client not to make any admissions or statements that the Court can take into consideration (usually against the party making the statement). The Court will ask if there is any hope of the matter being resolved without an evidentiary hearing. If the complainant is willing, the TRO can be dismissed. If there is no hope of dismissal, it is often better for the defense to request an adjournment of the evidentiary hearing. This allows the defense the time to gather whatever evidence is available to counter what the complainant is relying upon to support the petition for the FRO. It also allows the defense the time to get any witnesses who can testify for the client to counter what the complainant is saying. 

The Domestic Violence Act does not provide for discovery, as is typical in other types of legal proceedings, since these hearings occur within such a short time frame. If the defense is aware of either some item that will assist in the defense, or a witness that will not willingly come to Court to testify for the client, there are legal processes (via the subpoena process) to compel the production of the item, or the witness to come to Court. It is essential to the defense that the client advise the lawyer as early as possible of the types of evidence / or witnesses, that are available to defend against the issuance of the FRO. Among the types of proofs that a client should discuss with defense counsel to see if they are applicable in their case, are evidence of prior Domestic Violence history, the police reports of the incident, the 911 call, and the possibility of using expert witness testimony. 

Please contact the law offices of Jason Matey, Attorney At Law, to discuss your option with a TRO or FRO has been issued against you and my office can help defend your rights.  

2 Comments to Defending Against a FRO: You Need An Attorney :

Comments RSS
bicycle accident lawyers sydney on Wednesday, January 02, 2013 3:45 PM
Most private defense attorneys require payment, or partial payment, upfront for their services, which may follow a number of billing schedules.
Reply to comment

criminal defense attorney on Tuesday, January 08, 2013 9:47 AM
Defending from FRO and other laws, sometimes attorneys needed which prevent from this. But it is also costlier. So everyone should not afford it.
Reply to comment

Add a Comment

Your Name:
Email Address: (Required)
Make your text bigger, bold, italic and more with HTML tags. We'll show you how.
Website Builder
provided by Vistaprint