Recent Posts

New Jersey Estate Tax: What You Should Know
Estate Planning for Same Sex Couples
The Court Grants Motion to Suppress Good Case For The Defense Bar
Racial Profiling--4th Amendment Injustice related to evidence supporessed
No Crack Reduction for Career Offenders Even if Sentence is Based On the Crack Range

Categories

Criminal Law
Current Events
Introduction of Jason Matey's blog
Speedy Trial Defense not triggered after 27 month delay
Wills: The Basics
powered by

My Blog

When GPS Tracking Violates Privacy Rights


For the right to personal privacy to survive in America in this digital age, courts must be meticulous in applying longstanding privacy protections to new technology. This did not happen in an unfortunate ruling last month by a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.The case concerned a drug conviction based on information about the defendant’s location that the government acquired from a cellphone he carried on a three-day road trip in a motor home. The data, apparently obtained with a phone company’s help, led to a warrantless search of the motor home and the seizure of incriminating evidence.

The majority opinion held that there was no constitutional violation of the defendant’s rights because he “did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the data given off by his voluntarily procured pay-as-you-go cellphone.”The panel drew a distinction between its ruling and a ruling by the Supreme Court last January in United States v. Jones, which held that the placement of a hidden device on a suspect’s car without a valid warrant violated the Fourth Amendment. 

The three-judge panel said that its case, in contrast, did not involve physical trespass on the suspect’s private property. The judges also asserted that the tracking in the case before them was not sufficiently “comprehensive” to be “unreasonable for Fourth Amendment purposes” and trigger the need for a warrant — even though the police tracked the defendant’s every move for three days, hardly a negligible time period.

The Jones case suggests that the Supreme Court’s future direction may be more protective of privacy in cases involving new and potentially invasive technologies. In two concurring opinions in that case, a majority of justices agreed that “longer-term” GPS monitoring impinged on expectations of privacy.As Justice Sonia Sotomayor stressed in her concurrence, “GPS monitoring generates a precise, comprehensive record of a person’s public movements that reflects a wealth of detail about her familial, political, professional, religious, and sexual associations.” 

If anything, tracking someone using cellphone GPS capabilities is even more invasive than following someone with a GPS device attached to a car since it allows for 24/7 coverage. Most people carry their phones wherever they go, including into their homes.The circuit court panel majority concluded that because the defendant’s phone emitted information that could be picked up by law enforcement agents, he had no reasonable expectation of privacy and thus no warrant was needed to conduct the surveillance. 

This was at odds with yet another Supreme Court ruling, in 2001, involving a thermal-imaging device aimed at a private home from a public street.Carrying a cellphone should not obliterate privacy rights or the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement. The full Sixth Circuit should grant a pending request for a rehearing and reverse the panel’s damaging ruling.

Jason Charles Matey, Esq. 


8 Comments to When GPS Tracking Violates Privacy Rights :

Comments RSS
Jemmy Finn on Tuesday, November 27, 2012 7:13 AM
Resourceful allocation with instructive education! I'm glad to learn about GPS tracking various aspects and privacy rights as well. Thanks.
Reply to comment


information about RTI on Monday, December 24, 2012 1:28 AM
It was quite exciting to know about GPS tracking i am satisfied to come across this.
Reply to comment


Stock Trade Tracker on Tuesday, March 05, 2013 3:38 AM
This is just the information I am finding everywhere. I and my friend were arguing about an issue similar to this! Now I know that I was right. Thanks for the information you post. I just subscribe your blog. This is a nice blog.
Reply to comment


mold removal toronto on Friday, March 15, 2013 7:51 AM
This is very good blog for me because in this blog the content is related to my interest...Thanks for sharing...Move on
Reply to comment


Bicycle accident lawyers on Tuesday, March 26, 2013 6:07 AM
The GPS technology is widely used technology which is important for the tracking the roads and area but yes there is chance of privacy right misuse and it is important to have proper security system.
Reply to comment


motor accidents compensation on Friday, April 05, 2013 7:31 AM
Useful information shared "When GPS Tracking Violates Privacy Rights ". I am very happy to read this article. Thanks for giving us nice info. Fantastic walk through. I appreciate this post.
Reply to comment


Replica Vacheron Constantin Extra Plates Watches on Tuesday, April 16, 2013 1:40 AM
Our team of professionals shares a huge passion for high quality Replica Vacheron Constantin Extra Plates Watches. Items such as these give anyone who wears them quintessential charm and the flare of a fashionista.
Reply to comment


vehicle tracking systems on Thursday, May 30, 2013 8:03 AM
Outstanding post article. Thanks for sharing this useful information. I am looking forward for your next helpful content. Carry on...!!!
Reply to comment

Add a Comment

Your Name:
Email Address: (Required)
Website:
Comment:
Make your text bigger, bold, italic and more with HTML tags. We'll show you how.
Website Builder
provided by Vistaprint